Now, I'm trying to rid myself of having traffic tunneled through the att gateway, instead I want it to go UTM ONT. What you lose in performance you gain by being able to run multiple servers on the same machine (maybe a pbx?) Been running utm under exsi 6.5 since last September without much issue. Is this true?Īll said and done, is there anything I can do to get the I219 NIC to work without buying more hardware? I've seen another post that states both NICs have to be the same. I've built the appliance in a small ITX case and there is no room for a PCI card and I don't really want to buy another, larger case to fit a PCI NIC. Has there been a regression in the kernel version? However, two posts further down, states it is supported in kernel 3.12.x I am assuming the "-LM Phy with AMT" is not causing the mentions the supported kernel version as 3.19.x, however, I notice UTM 9.509-3 is running 3.12.74-0: The motherboard comes with two onboard nics: "Intel Ethernet Controller I210-AT and Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM Phy with AMT". I see this has been asked before and based on the favourable answer given by almost two years ago - to the day, I went ahead and bought a SuperMicro X11SSV-LVDS motherboard, confident that I would not have any NIC issues, however UTM 9.509-3 is not detecting the I219-LM NIC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |